(Потому что наши русские читатели очень важны, мы сейчас в поисках профессионального переводчика. Мы приносим свои извинения, что на данный момент, мы можем лишь предоставить текст на английском языке.)

What would a roundabout superficial brainstorming session yield as answer to the question of why is the global arrangement of wealth and power distributed in the way we see it now-days? Why did the European colonialists manage to dominate and decimate the Maya, Inca, and Aztec empires or the nomadic hunter gatherer tribes of the Americas, Africa, and Australia, but not the other way around?

Can the shallow assumptions about the genetic inferiority, concerning either intellectual or brute physical fitness, that the conquered societies purportedly were the phenotypic manifestations of, be the correct explanations for the observed happenings? Could the Conquistadors’ genes have made them more easily adaptable to whatever environmental pressures nature contrived in their path towards conquering the major societies of the Americas?

Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel will offer an au courant, astute explanation about the systemic distribution of wealth all around the world, and will flat-out deny one of the premises that started this article, the one concerning the supposedly intellectual inferiority of the hunter gatherer tribes. The genes responsible for the mental abilities of the less wealthy, less powerful, less literate, less industrialized societies that roamed all continents, and that still roam certain places on this planet are certainly, Jared argues, not to be considered as having any significant importance into the developments of the last 10000 years. Hunter gatherer tribes are not more primitive, but are the result of the environmental hold backs, be it the scarce resources, geography, or the improper climate that bedeviled these tribes in one form or another during the lapse of time.

So if this purported difference in intelligence between Eurasians and their conquered societies is not a reason worth taking into account if we want to answer the above questions, what are the real causes for the observed differences in wealth and power? Why wasn’t Africa, with its more than 5 million years of human evolutionary history, the launch pad of colonizations, technology, and industrialization? What are the ins and outs of the causes that made it almost sure that Eurasia will satisfy the adequate conditions in which industrialized societies based on literacy, steel, and technology could easily evolve and conquer the rest of the world?

The answers to the above questions are rather counter-intuitive, and some are certainly cynical. First of all to put an end to all theories that struggle with human genetics as a cause for the observed facts let me state this: There would be little time for much significant differential evolution of intelligence in the different tribes that roamed the various continents of our planet; the few hundreds of ancestors of all living humans today took an exit out of Africa some 100.000 yrs ago, too early for significant genetic mutations to have happened. More to that, look at industrialized societies today! Besides the assault of useful information of course, today’s children grow with a shallow view of life, being bombarded all day long with stupid useless hogwash memes generated by their TV programs or their Facebook account.

Contrary to them, the children of the remaining hunter gatherer tribes that live in our times (Papua New Guinea) stretch out their mental muscles early in their lives, having to cope with wild life, scarce resources, spatial memory and navigation, territory memorizing, and other types of issues that take their survival skills to the edge. So, maybe society and culture, not genetics, should be considered a significant factor in the overall intelligence of today’s humans. Therefore, you can hardly say people of hunter gatherer tribes are intellectually inferior to us. So for the sake of argument, Jared argues, let’s consider them equal.

        In 11000 B.C. all things were dull, similar, and un-experimented. All tribes looked almost the same, and behaved almost the same as if nothing significant had happened since the time our ancestors escaped Africa 100.000 yrs ago. But a strange force accelerated the evolution of the tribes from the Fertile Crescent, the cradle of civilization from Western Asia, which included the once fertile regions of Mesopotamia and the Levant, delimited by the dry climate of the Syrian Desert to the south and the Anatolian highlands to the north. In this region plant and animal domestication began to appear.

More >